Rate this book

Byron In Love (2009)

by Edna O'Brien(Favorite Author)
3.22 of 5 Votes: 3
ISBN
0297855530 (ISBN13: 9780297855538)
languge
English
publisher
George Weidenfeld & Nicholson
review 1: Among the worst books I have ever read. The text is rambling, disjointed, and filled with grammatical errors and just-plain-ugly verbiage. I am a fan of Lord Byron's work, but this book was so bad that I actually found myself disliking both Byron and the author just a few pages in.It is fitting that Ms. O'Brien is a James Joyce biographer. "Ulysses" was far more intelligible than this train wreck. Ms. Dorothy Parker could have been describing "Byron in Love" when she said "This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force."
review 2: This book jumped off the library shelf at me because though I've heard of Byron, I knew little more than that he was 'mad, bad and dangerous to know' and consorted with his sister, so I thought
... more it was time to find out more. Well, the boy certainly was dangerous to know - he had more cases of the clap than a year's intake at the GUM clinic. If he came strolling through my front door, I wouldn't touch him with a bargepole! The book was simply unputdownable - but I've a notion this was more to do with the non-stop exploits of the man himself than Edna O'Brien's writing. I've always believed that with a well-written book you don't notice the writing (the construction, the choice of words) but with an ill-written book, you find yourself forever stumbling over bad construction. This book fell into the latter category. I'm a big fan of commas - well placed, they guide the reader. O'Brien's commas, when they appeared, did nothing to help the flow of the words. I came across sentences with three subordinate clauses and no main clause that I could discern. O'Brien merrily used the personal pronoun 'he' to refer to Byron even though he hadn't been mentioned for a half a page and in between she'd been talking about some other chap entirely. There were some sentences that I simply couldn't decipher and was forced to abandon. Really - don't writers have editors any more? I'm all for the evolution of language and grammar, but writing must be understandable! less
Reviews (see all)
icarlyluver
Seems like Lord Byron was the original rockstar--or was it just a case of arrested development?
Elizabeth
Interesting to learn of Byron's "muses". Quite the early 19th century rock star!
SEDESEDE
Okay, author seemed a little enamoured with his 'adonis like features'.
terrah
He appears to have been a mesmerising but unpleasant man.
lexi1960
very good review to come
Write review
Review will shown on site after approval.
(Review will shown on site after approval)