Rate this book

Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric (2009)

by Ward Farnsworth(Favorite Author)
4.11 of 5 Votes: 5
ISBN
1567923852 (ISBN13: 9781567923858)
languge
English
genre
publisher
David R Godine
review 1: The book surprised me. I had hoped it covered logic and rhetorical devices to mislead another during a discussion. This is a book about the structure of the written and spoken word. It's essentially a well written dictionary of common rhetorical forms such as anadiplosis. The discussion each form includes quotes from classical english sources, including speeches and books, and variations on the form.The structures themselves are interesting enough, but the examples are beautiful, taken from some amazing speeches and writers.
review 2: This was an informative, useful and at times fun to read intermediate level reference on English Rhetoric. Every writer at some point should pick up a copy. It is not something to read in one sitting, nor is it something to read o
... morenly once, as there is a lot of sometimes complex information packed into this small volume. But as something to refer to, and re-read in pieces over time, it presents with quite the value for the wordsmith.It introduced me to some writers and speakers I otherwise might not have encountered, but whom now I will at least investigate further. (If for no other reasons then to read the rest of the speeches from which the excellent examples are drawn.)That being said, I found it to at times be a bit thick, repetitive beyond what was required to make the point, and unnecessarily convoluted when presenting examples that bore little difference from the wealth of examples already provided.To the uninitiated, the author complicates the issues by explaining a concept, supplying plentiful examples, and then sub-categorizing to such a degree that what would otherwise have been a simple concept takes on the appearance of being rather complex.For example, if a recipe book were to be laid out in a similar fashion, the text would define salad, explain how to create same, proceed to elaborate on different types of salad, as well as with what other foods they may be safely paired. Not enough for some, more than is needed for others, but a logical amount of information for most. Using such a book would explain the nature of say, a Caesar salad. The reader could probably assume that certain salads would proceed to fall under this umbrella.Yet to extend this metaphor, the book at times would use long lists to distinguish a Caesar salad served in a wooden bowl, from a Caesar salad served in a glass bowl. And than one served in a plastic bowl. And finally, one served on a plate instead of a bowl, (a plate which could also be wooden, glass, or plastic.) In every case above, the salad itself is unchanged. It is merely served in different receptacles. While a valid technical difference does exist, are four more pages of such elaboration really making the concept of a Caesar salad any clearer to the reader? I would suggest they do not, and at times initial clarity becomes muddied with so much specificity. However on the whole, a treasure for language enthusiasts. I will be reading it again in pieces for years to come, and applying its lessons to my own writing and speaking. (Some of which I already recognized in the definitions given in the book. Another of its strengths being to define what is already familiar to us, subconsciously.) less
Reviews (see all)
none
I really loved this, though I skimmed it due to my brain being at capacity.
jrksrstens
Best book on categorizing figures of speech in English prose.
Leo
Now I have a pressing need to orate.
yesi
Wonderful resource for my AP class!
sammie79
Delicious, fun, indispensable.
Write review
Review will shown on site after approval.
(Review will shown on site after approval)