Rate this book

Would You Eat Your Cat? Key Ethical Conundrums And What They Tell You About Yourself (2010)

by Jeremy Stangroom(Favorite Author)
3.32 of 5 Votes: 4
ISBN
0393339424 (ISBN13: 9780393339420)
languge
English
genre
publisher
W. W. Norton & Company
review 1: I won this book from a GoodReads.com giveaway. I entered said giveaway because of the book title and cover photo. That little cat is so cute! But when I got the book and saw that it had to do with ethics, I started thinking I should stop picking my books based on the cuteness of the cover and actually read the description. However, everything turned out okay in the end. Would You Eat Your Cat: Key Ethical Conundrums and What They Tell You About Yourself was a little book with a lot of punch. It asked insightful questions about morals and ethics, gave a kind of humorous scenario for readers to chew on, and then provided different ways to look at the situation along with real world scenarios. I discussed some of the ethical conundrums with others and it sparked a bit of disc... moreussion. Everyone liked the pictures.Over all I thought Would You Eat Your Cat was an interesting little book and is a great tool to start a debate at a dinner party gone wrong and a great book to keep in your bathroom (this is not meant as a bad thing. It's just that the passages are short and it's one of those books you don't need to read straight through. You can put it down and then not come back to it for a few days). One little thing that I didn't like was that right in the introduction, Strangroom explains how to use the book. He suggests reading an ethical question, located in the first half of the book, and then flipping to the back of the book to read the discussion. Then flip forward again to read the next question and flip back to the corresponding discussion. My question is why all the flipping back and forth? Why not just put the discussion right after the question, if that is how the book is supposed to be read, anyway?
review 2: I won this book in a goodreads first reads giveaway. I am not a big fan of philosophy and that seems to be the point of this book. Therefore, I was not a huge fan of this book. I do not like having to go from the front of the book to read the scenario to the back to read what is says about me morally. Also the quick decisions do not have any responses. I think this book should have combined the two sections and been a little more to the point. It was a quick read though! less
Reviews (see all)
LionBunny
It has good history and so called paradox but everything you except for the first chapter.
patjack
Really helps you think through a number of ethical conundrums. Interesting read!
leti
This is funny and thought provoking.
gingy699
What a fun little book.
Write review
Review will shown on site after approval.
(Review will shown on site after approval)